'Children should run everything' says person paid to say children should run things.
The world
of politics was rocked today by claims by the Children's' Commissioner that children should be in
charge of everything.
'It makes
perfect sense,' says the former Director of Learning and Culture at Gateshead
Council. 'Children are essentially just as good as adults, and anyone that says
that they are in some way subordinate to them is an enemy of children, and we
don't want to be enemies of children do we? Do we?'
Asked
what implications this might have in practical terms, she elaborated.
'Well,
for a start, I'd bring the under twelves into the Crown Court- throw out all
those dusty old men with their frightfully ageist views, and get some innocent,
honest common sense into the courts. Of course, they'd have to have some time
in the afternoon for naps...but there's no change there, eh?!'
'Curses!'
|
'After
that, we could get to work on the real problems- adults in politics; we could
have all the MPs replaced with regional Youth Mayors, who would listen to the
people who really matter- the children- before making unbiased, careful
decisions that would represent everyone, not just a handful of geriatric
pedagogues. Next we could have children panels selecting CEOs of national
companies, and designing bridges and ships and space rockets and that. How hard
can it be?'
But it
doesn't end there. 'Eventually I plan to apply to the European Court of Human
Rights to force every lecturer in every University to resign, to be replaced by
a five-year old called Darren, who's got some really, really interesting things
to say about Call of Duty: Black Ops. Once we've done that, we can move
on to those other bastions of discrimination- research laboratories. Have you
seen CERN? Not a toddler in sight. How on Earth do they expect children
to be effectively represented in particle physics? It's disgusting. Just
because they can't count past twenty yet, doesn't mean they have nothing to add
to the debate about the existence of the Higgs- Boson.'
Ms A's
latest announcement comes after her recent comments in the press that children
should be part of the selection and recruitment process of new teachers,
including grading lessons and forming part of the interview panels. Teachers
were last night said to be 'unsurprised' by the news:
'These figures are a damn disgrace!'
|
'To be
frank, it's just another day, another shitty dollar for us,' said Mr Mendicant,
a year 8 Science teacher. 'Everyone and his donkey has a crack at how they
think we should teach- in that respect, the teaching profession is not unlike a
Rubik's Cube left alone in a room full of bored neurotics. Nobody can keep
their hands off it, and everyone thinks they know how to solve it. It was only
a matter of time before someone thought that kids could tell us how to do it
better than we can. After all, what do we know? We've only got degrees, years
of life experience and a professional qualification. Of course an
overconfident ten year-old can tell us how to do it, or what kind of skill set
would be required to do the job well. Of course they can.'
Asked if
this attitude was simply cynicism, and that children could offer a unique
perspective as to what makes a good teacher and a good lesson, Mr Mendicant
rolled his eyes so far back they practically detached from the optic nerve.
'Yes, that's an excellent point. Except for two things: 1. We were all children
too, so actually we already possess their perspective, only we've added life
experience to their incessant, egoistic demands; 2. What they like might not
actually be relevant to what makes a good teacher, like being strict and making
them work hard.'
'So
actually, that's not really a good point after all. Now you'll have to excuse
me, but I have my annual pay review in a few minutes with my year 9 class, and
I'm hoping I played them enough Doctor Who and violent pornographic cartoons to
qualify for a point on the salary scale. Wish me luck.'
Your new Minister for Education.
|
The
outspoken public figure has recently defended herself against claims that she
is being paid not unadjacent to £138,000 per year for what is essentially a
non-job. 'No, no, no, no,' she said. 'That's not true at all. I'm paid three
grand short of the Prime Minister to tell people that children should run
everything. See? That's a proper job. Well worth what I imagine is approximately
three times your salary.'
'Teaching?
Now that's a non-job. Anyone can do it. Why, my two year old
Springer Spaniel could probably deliver a decent three-part lesson on the
Tudors. In fact...that's an idea.'
A Facebook
site was created last week, thought to be the work of a rag-tag band of
disgruntled teachers, called, 'If children are such f***ing experts, why don't
they run the Office of the Children's Commissioner ? Just a thought.' The Office was
unavailable for comment, as everyone was watching Charlie and Lola and
sewing sequins onto their Stetsons in preparation for an early evening birthday
party.
Maggie Atkinson is thirteen
and three quarters at heart.
£138k a year?? Seriously?? Flippin' 'eck. High time I reinvented myself as a champion of children's rights. There's clearly gold in them thar hills.
ReplyDeleteNot any more. The Gravy Train is having its wheels trimmed due to the Credit Crunch. I have no doubt that as soon as the economy heats up, it'll start up all over again...
ReplyDelete